tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2252148456560466396.post4304924218293999808..comments2023-06-19T13:17:55.210+00:00Comments on MediaPaL@LSE: None shall pass?: libel tourism challenged in the USAndrew Scotthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08664518896648660120noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2252148456560466396.post-64261780536388753762007-11-21T12:41:00.000+00:002007-11-21T12:41:00.000+00:00It is very interesting that the UK newspapers have...It is very interesting that the UK newspapers have seen fit to support this legal argument, and one must ask why when the upshot will almost certainly have only minimal impact on their own businesses. Clearly, their purpose is to foment comparative criticism of UK libel law by reference to its much more media-friendly US counterpart.<BR/><BR/>Is it possible to get hold of the scipt of the amicus brief?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2252148456560466396.post-55457721273128293472007-11-20T13:16:00.000+00:002007-11-20T13:16:00.000+00:00For more comment on this case, see the piece by Da...For more comment on this case, see the <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/nov/19/mondaymediasection.law" REL="nofollow">piece by Dan Tench</A> in the Guardian.Andrew Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08664518896648660120noreply@blogger.com